“Not yet. That number is Rowan's estimate. The buyer has never said it.”
Ask the question. Bryce brings the evidence, from the calls behind your numbers.
Bryce reads the calls, the roleplays, the coaching history and the deals behind your pipeline. Ask him in the platform or in Slack: which deals are real, who needs coaching on what, what to cover in Thursday's 1:1. He answers with the moment it came from, so the read holds up in the room.
Prep me for Thursday. He answers with the call it came from.
A 1:1 prep from Bryce is one strength, one gap and one drill, each tied to a moment on a recorded call or a roleplay from the last fortnight. No transcript travels with it: the manager gets the pattern and the timestamp, and the rep's calls stay the rep's.
Prep my next 1:1. What to cover, with the evidence attached.
Find the capability gap. One gap across the team, and the drill for the next session.
Deal inspection where you work. Ask in Slack, answered in Slack, on seats, nothing extra.
Managers get coached too. Hannah runs the leadership capability work with SBR Consulting.
Specimen team Discovery is the strength. The next step is the gap.
Ines gets buyers talking: on three of her four calls this month the buyer spoke more than she did. Every one of the four ended without a dated commitment from the buyer. Agree one drill: before the call ends, the buyer names the next step and the date, out loud.
[Calloway Health, 9 Sep, 31:40] [Roleplay, 11 Sep]Which deals are real. Read from what the buyer said, not what the stage says.
Commit is a feeling until someone reads the calls behind it. Bryce joins each deal to its recorded conversations and asks one thing of every number in the forecast: did the buyer say it? A deal carrying the rep's estimate is marked at risk, with the call where the number should have been.
| Deal | Owner | Value | Read | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ardent Foods | Tomas | £210k | Real | CFO, 3 Sep: "we lose a week a month to this". Mutual plan dated. |
| Penrose Media | Leah | £96k | Real | Procurement in the thread since 29 Aug. Plan signed both sides. |
| Sable Marine | Rowan | £140k | At risk | The cost in the forecast is Rowan’s estimate. The buyer has never said it. |
| Calloway Health | Ines | £68k | At risk | Three calls, no next step dated by the buyer on any of them. |
| Vireo Labs | Tomas | £52k | Slipping | Fourteen days since the champion replied. Single-threaded. |
- Current state mappedTeam, tools, volumes in the buyer’s numbers73%
- Economic buyer reachedNamed on the record and spoken to48%
- Impact quantifiedThe cost of the gap, sized by the buyer41%
- Buyer-owned next stepNamed by the buyer, with a date, before the call ends22%
In Slack,
on seats.
The manager's questionAsk where the team already is. The answer arrives with its evidence.
- Is this deal ready for commit?
- Who on the team still skips the economic buyer?
- What do I cover in tomorrow's 1:1?
- Which calls should the new hire listen to first?
Nothing, and that is the change. Fourteen days since the champion replied, one contact in the account. Tomas should open a second thread before Friday.
Look Back,
on credits.
Recorded calls, joined to outcomesLast quarter's calls, scored against this quarter's scorecard.
- Every recorded call joined to the CRM outcome
- Scored against your method, criterion by criterion
- Where the won deals differed from the lost ones, in the buyer's words
- The team's evidence, in your warehouse
In today’s competitive market, feedback on every call is crucial but time-consuming. The current approach isn’t just unsustainable; it’s harming productivity. Replicate is the answer.
Bring the numbers. Bryce brings the calls behind them.
A working session on your own pipeline: your recorded calls, your scorecard, your commit list. Ask him the question you would ask in the forecast meeting and see what the evidence supports.